Sanjha Morcha

What’s New

Click the heading to open detailed news

Current Events :

web counter

Print Media Reproduced Defence Related News

For Defence Contracts Below Rs 150 Crores, Startups No Longer Required To Submit Financial Details While Bidding

For Defence Contracts Below Rs 150 Crores, Startups No Longer Required To Submit Financial Details While Bidding

In a bid to encourage the participation of startups in the bidding process for defence contracts, the Ministry of Defence has come out with some special provisions in procurement policy which will allow such companies to submit bids for contracts valued below Rs 150 crore sans the requirement to prove their financial credentials, reports The Economic Times.

As such contracts are relatively small compared to the overall procurement requirements of the defence forces, startups will only be required to prove that they have technical expertise to fulfill the order. Moreover, this exception is specially tailored to encourage startups, and not just any new entrant.

Thus, mid to large sized firms which are making a fresh foray into the defence sector will still have to submit their financials.

The new policy change not only makes it easier for startups to participate in the government’s ambitious ‘Make in India’ programme in the defence sector, but it also creates more competition for these defence contracts, which can allow better products to eventually reach the armed forces.


General Qamar Bajwa: All You Need To Know About The General Who (Re)Appointed Himself by Lt Gen Ata Husnain

Pakistan Army Chief Qamar Javed Bajwa gets another term.

Snapshot
  • By ‘reappointing’ himself as the Pakistan Army Chief, General Bajwa has resolved only one issue — and that is, Imran Khan does not have to govern Pakistan or find his faculties to do that.

    General Bajwa is at hand to do that in a role covering every sphere of national functioning.

If I had to write the annual confidential report of General Qamar Javed Bajwa at the end of his first avatar as Pakistan Army Chief, it may have commenced as follows — “a wily officer, capable of working for himself as much as he works for the organisation…”. That sums up the character of Pakistan’s senior-most officer.

Bajwa was appointed Pakistan Army Chief in November 2016 to succeed General Raheel Sharif, who was considered much more hyper by personality and an avowed India baiter.

However, he did not push for extension of tenure like his predecessor General Parvez Kayani, and retired to the lucrative appointment of the Commander-in-Chief of the Islamic Military Counter Terrorism Coalition, Riyadh.

Bajwa had better plans for himself.

Highlighting the situation on the borders and the region as severely challenging to Pakistan’s security, he approved a three-year extension for himself as Pakistan’s Army Chief.

Theoretically, it is the Pakistan prime minister who appoints the army chief. Since Imran Khan is known to be a protege of his own Army Chief, he played an inconsequential role in according that extension.

Bajwa’s extension will upset many an ambition among Pakistan’s senior hierarchy. Change of an army chief manifests in many ways; one being the exit of a coterie of favourites and arrival of another. But that won’t happen here.

Bajwa tried to be different in the early part of his tenure before sinking into the routine affair of extending the Pakistan cause on Jammu and Kashmir (J&K).

I had monitored his rise from the rank of Brigadier simply because I trusted the opinion of a colleague from the Indian Army’s military secretary’s branch who happened to be a rare serving officer to visit Pakistan as part of a goodwill delegation almost 12 years ago.

He came back and informed me that he met this tall Pakistani brigadier, who was quite different to his colleagues; his utterances appeared to speak of possibility of peace with India and economic development of Pakistan as the main challenge ahead.

One studied his background and on him being appointed the Pakistan Army chief expected that there could be a welcome change. Having had three tenures in Pakistan-occupied J&K (PoJK) in crucial appointments, the futility or inevitability of continuing the proxy war would largely fall to him to decide.

To say that General Bajwa disappointed me after a brief initial positive impression, would be an understatement. He actually let down my own sense of assessment.

Here is what I wrote in Swarajya dated 28 November 2016:

Usually machismo may demand false military notions of domination and some robust trans-LoC exchanges as the new Pakistan Army chief takes over. It would be in everyone’s interest if some time is given to Gen Qamar Bajwa to make his assessment, send messages through the hotline that Pakistan may wish to re-appraise its policy vis-a-vis the LoC and await response. I think there may be a chance that Gen Bajwa may just turn out to be different. The experience as GOC 10 Corps may have tempered him into the futility of the breaches of ceasefire. To expect anything on the sponsorship of proxy war may be a little too much; one step at a time will be a good policy.

To say that Bajwa did not try may not be right. One could not expect him to straightaway start smoking the peace pipe. He would attempt to wrest moral ascendancy from the Indian Army on the Line of Control (LoC) in a gesture of machismo before he would rest on his oars.

He did make references to peace with India and that is how the Bajwa Doctrine confused everyone; it is dead and buried for now. Its whole idea was to confuse with the typical Pakistan Army strategy of ambivalence.

However, Bajwa hoped to get an opening somewhere by which he could look towards a lowering of temperature in J&K to allow Pakistan more time to focus on its economy and on Afghanistan which he knew was Pakistan’s trump card in its quest to remain strategically relevant for the international community.

A return to J&K later was always possible since Pakistan had all along followed the strategy of calibration.

The tanking Pakistan economy and the failure of the China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) to deliver at expected speed on the economic front probably changed things in his calculus. His personal ambitions to remain in a position of power also started increasing.

February 2019 changed a lot of things. It was probably a calculated risk he took with Pulwama. He managed to use his Inter Services Public Relations (ISPR) wing to spin a perception that India’s Balakot attack had led to an advantage for the Pakistan military.

The focus returned quite irretrievably to J&K. Alongside that came President Donald Trump’s perception that without a full and final withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan, his chance at re-election in 2020 was not going anywhere, and Pakistan was the key to that.

To top it all a new much stronger government got elected in India in May 2019 and the chances of it following a more confident policy on J&K started to emerge.

While Pakistan had to display to international monitoring organisations its sense of commitment towards dismantling the infrastructure towards support to radical and terror related organisations, its strategic relevance had to be maintained.

Bajwa was left with the unenviable task of keeping Afghanistan and J&K in the focus, both simultaneously. This is something Pakistan has tried to avoid to remain focused on one at a time.

Prime Minister Imran Khan quite clueless in the ways of governance and especially in the domain of national security, relations with the international community and most importantly with India, found Bajwa a virtual mentor.

Imran Khan anyway owes his ‘selection’ to the Pakistan Army Chief and has now outsourced every facet of national security and almost all governance to him.

The unprecedented step of taking the Army Chief along for his official visit to the US was really the final stamp on the certification that Imran Khan is Bajwa’s man and not the other way round.

The most important issue now is how Bajwa will handle J&K. He has already stated – “Pakistan will go to any extent to support Kashmiris, immaterial of the cost involved”.

Pakistan has pulled out the stops almost completely in trying to retrieve initiative after the Indian government’s recent landmark constitutional and administrative decisions.

Although a new narrative is being put out by Indian leaders on PoK and Gilgit-Baltistan being the only remaining issues on the agenda, Pakistan is making every effort to internationalise the issue.

It received a misinterpreted message from the US President that the US would be ready to mediate on J&K, forgetting the aspect of ‘bilateralism’, which is enshrined in the Shimla Agreement of 1972 to which Pakistan is a signatory.

Three prominent former diplomats of Pakistan have made an unprecedented statement supporting the employment of sub-conventional violence to keep intact the Pakistan perceived aspirations of the people of J&K.

All the above appears to indicate turbulent times ahead in the subcontinent.

Pakistan appears unmindful of its state of economy in its efforts towards ratcheting tension with India.

However, Bajwa knows that conventional war is not an option and India is internationally better networked than it ever was before. In the short term, it’s the United Nations General Assembly session commencing in September 2019 that is in focus.

He will wish to ensure that J&K does not disappear from focus; triggered violence at the LoC and the hinterland will ensure that.

The Taliban is not being helpful by increasing turbulence in Afghanistan. It is going to be a real challenge playing on both flanks and Pakistan could well end up being sandwiched through its own doings with few options available to retrieve itself.

Another major incident in J&K will invite muscular response from India and none can predict what that may be.

For General Bajwa, the only way out at the moment is to continue working on J&K but at slightly lower temperature to prevent any triggers that would force India’s hand.

He will need to convince the Taliban that its activities are not helpful towards maintaining any positive stance towards talks with the US. The 30-minute Trump-Modi discussion must also be causing some speculation in Pakistan.

For the moment it is a moral advantage that India enjoys but the speed at which things change in the subcontinent always remains unpredictable.

By ‘reappointing’ himself as the Pakistan Army Chief, General Bajwa has resolved only one issue. That is the fact that Imran Khan does not have to govern Pakistan or find his faculties to do that; General Qamar Javed Bajwa is at hand to do that, in a role covering every sphere of national functioning.


History of Struggle for Abrogation of Article 370 By Brig Anil Gupta

The political movement headed by Sheikh Abdullah that originated in Kashmir in 1931 (as part of a British conspiracy against the Maharaja) remained to some extent unsuccessful to gain the support of Jammu especially the Hindu dominated areas. Its genesis, growth and ideological moorings made it a suspect in the eyes of the Dogra Nationalists of Jammu who looked upon it as something alien and unacceptable. Pt Prem Nath Dogra led the All Jammu & Kashmir Rajya Hindu Sabha as the main opposition party. It merged with Praja Parishad which was formed in Jammu immediately after the tribal invasion in November 1947. The genesis of the history of struggle for total integration of the state with India began with the birth of All Jammu & Kashmir Praja Parishad popularly known as Praja Parishad. The existence of Praja Parishad as a protest movement opposed the Sheikh’s major policy planks such as abolition of land-lords, anti-Dogra drive, attempts at framing a separate constitution for the Jammu and Kashmir state and a separate flag, emblem etc.

Sheikh Abdullah became the Prime Minister of J&K in March 1948. He abhorred opposition. He wanted to become de facto ruler of J&K and replace monarchy with a dynastic rule. He was an advocate of “One Party State”. He forced Nehru to introduce Article 370 in the Constitution of India to ensure Kashmiri Muslim Domination over Jammu & Ladakh. He was successful in his endeavour and went ahead with his plan of annihilation of the opposition. His cronies chanted slogans like, ‘ek Rehnama, Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah, ek Tanzeem National Conference, ek Jhanda, Halwala, ek Manshoor (manifesto) Naya Kashmir’ which created an intriguing situation in Jammu and Kashmir ringing the bells of imminent danger among the pro-integration Dogras of Jammu.

Visionary Pt. Prem Nath Dogra and his colleagues felt this rat-race was dangerous for the growth of democracy as this sentiment of “ek” would lead Sheikh Abdullah to fulfil his ambition of a “Single Party State” leading to totalitarianism. For democracy to prosper in the state and for establishment of true Lok Raj, existence of a strong opposition party was essential. Praja Parishad was expected to foot the bill. Moreover, the policies of Sheikh Abdullah were exclusive confined to the welfare of Kashmiri Muslims and ignored the sentiments and interests of the people of Jammu and Ladakh region. He could not think beyond Kashmiri speaking Muslims of the Valley. His animosity with the Maharaja transformed into hatred for the Dogras of Jammu which was unjust and unfair. Unfortunately, he enjoyed the backing of the ruling party in the Centre and the then Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru.

Though Jammu and Kashmir comprised of three distinct culturally and geographically exclusive regions namely Kashmir, Jammu and Ladakh yet the central leadership did not look beyond Kashmir and Sheikh Abdullah. The Kashmir centric inclination of the central government was a major cause of concern for the people of Jammu. The main task to which Praja Parishad was committed was the full integration of Jammu and Kashmir State with the Indian union, like other acceding states and safeguard the legitimate democratic rights of the people of Jammu from the anti-Dogra stance of Sheikh Abdullah government.

Sheikh’s continued discriminatory policies helped in Praja Parishad becoming popular in Jammu region among all sections including the Muslims. This growing popularity of Praja Parishad created panic in the Abdullah camp and he resorted to strong arm tactics to supress the growth of Praja Parishad since it posed a strong challenge to his political ambitions. Several activists were expelled from the State including the author’s grandfather Advocate Bishan Das Mahajan of RS Pura along with his family.
The leaders of Praja Parishad , considered a threat by Sheikh Abdullah, were put behind the bar in February 1949. Section 3 of Ranbir Penal Code (RPC), which is known as ‘Daffa Tun’ i.e. put in lockup without any trial, was slapped on Pt. Dogra and his colleagues. They were shifted to Srinagar jail to face severe winter cold. The extent of the NC rulers pique towards Praja Parishad could be gauged from the fact that on the jail’s account board the activists were listed as “Enemy Agent”.

By mid – 1949 Sheikh imprisoned as many as 294 Parishad workers. In May 1949, Praja Parishad started ‘Satyagrah’ for ensuring the release of Pt. Dogra. Though Abdullah wanted to crush this movement but he could not do so and finally he yielded to the pressure of the ‘Sataygrah’ and was forced to release Pt. Dogra from Jail on 8th October 1949 with the intervention of some nationalist leaders in Delhi. The atrocities of Sheikh on ‘Satyagrahis’ were such that incapacitated many of them including Pt. Dogra.

But this was not an end of the persecution and high handedness of Abdullah government. His hatred against the nationalists was aggravated by the fact that Parishad’s demand for full integration clashed directly with the demand of National Conference for complete autonomy of the state. As many as 15 youths were shot dead and some others injured at various places for hoisting the Indian Tricolour. The agitation launched by Parishad also included the demand for abolishing of permit system for entering or leaving the state.

Many may argue the timing of this article and need for it being written now under the changed circumstances. A reference to the beautifully worded poem of the famous poet Henry Wadsworth Longfellow will not be out of place. “Heights by great men reached and kept were not attained by sudden flight but they, while their companions slept, were toiling upward in the night.” Now that the full integration has been achieved and Art 370 has lost its relevance, it is imperative for the present generation to know many sacrifices made and struggles launched by their predecessors which acted as the enabler of present landmark achievement.

The party tirelessly tried to unite the people of Jammu with a view to foil the attempts of those who either favoured autonomy or tried to separate the state from Indian Union. By 1951 the Party had become a power to reckon in the areas of Jammu and the only one which was in any real sense the opposition party. Praja Parishad always opposed the setting up of a separate Constituent Assembly for the state. It favoured the application of Indian Constitution.

Despite being opposed to a separate constitution for the state, a special session of the party held on May 8, 1951, decided to contest the elections to the constituent Assembly of the State. Because of the large scale rejection of nomination papers of its candidates and nefarious manipulation of the elections by Sheikh Abdullah, party decided to boycott the elections in protest. The party in spite of its strong support base did not have a single member in the constituent assembly which under Sheikh’s leadership went ahead with framing a constitution that promoted the concept of ‘State within a State.’

National Conference (NC) and its leader Sheikh did everything to ensure that all the members of NC would be there in Jammu and Kashmir Constituent Assembly. Sheikh dubbed the members of Praja Parishad as communal ignoring the fact that many Muslims were also contesting on the ticket of Praja Parishad. Praja Parishad turned into a mass movement and it played a key role in opposing separatist and communal politics in Jammu and Kashmir. Parishad always favoured the complete and total integration of Jammu and Kashmir with India and was opposed to Article 370.

Emboldened by the support he enjoyed from Nehru and after signing of Delhi Agreement, Sheikh started hoisting the National Conference flag in official functions and atop government buildings. However, in keeping with his habit of double-speak he implemented the Agreement only in part to further his agenda of autonomy. On January 15, 1952, Sheikh delivered a speech in an official function at Gandhi Memorial College, Jammu and hoisted National Conference Flag alongside the National Flag asking the students to salute it but the students objected to it. This infuriated Abdullah and he ensured that the students were penalized. This was followed by 38 days of hunger strike by students in 1952. On February 8, 1952 people in Jammu came out in solidarity with the protesting students that further infuriated Sheikh and he imposed curfew and arrested Pt. Dogra. This was followed by intense public pressure that forced Delhi to act and ensure the release of Pt. Dogra and others.

It soon turned into a public movement against the despotic rule of Sheikh and his anti-national activities. The movement found support nationally in form of Bhartiya Jan Sangh which was formed in 1951.

Another mass movement was launched by Parishad in November 1952 against the separatist and communal politics of Abdullah. Jan Sangh President Dr Syama Prasad Mookerjee announced in December 1952 to launch a nation-wide agitation for the abolition of Article 370. On May 8, 1953 he decided to enter J&K violating the prevalent permit system and was arrested by Sheikh as soon as he set foot on the soil of the state. Mookerjee intended to lead the ongoing full-blown public agitation in Jammu. The agitation had a powerful slogan: Ek Desh mein Do Vidhan, Ek Desh mein Do Nishaan, Ek Desh mein Do Pradhan, nahin challenegey, nahin challengey. He was jailed and tortured at Srinagar under the despotic rule of Sheikh which led to his mysterious death on 23 June 1953. An estimated 10,000 activists were imprisoned in Jammu, Punjab and Delhi, including Members of Parliament leading to an uproar in India.

Blinded by his ambition, Sheikh indulged in competitive communalism and worked towards establishment of independent Muslim majority state claiming that India was not secular enough. Parishad opposed it tooth and nail and accused that Sheikh was not Indian enough. Sheikh was finally arrested in August 1953 after he made secessionist speeches at RS Pura on April 10 and on 13 July stating in public, “Kashmir should have sympathy of both India and Pakistan…It is not necessary for our state to become an appendage of either India or Pakistan.”
Bakshi Ghulam Mohammad, who succeeded Sheikh implemented all the provisions of Delhi Agreement thus facilitating greater integration with the Centre. Praja Parishad movement largely subsided after these events. Parishad finally merged with Jan Sangh in 1963 and two years later National Conference merged with Congress.

Ever since then Jan Sangh and later Bharatiya Janata Party has been struggling and agitating for ending the special status of the state which not only promoted separatism, religious militancy and was the major cause of rampant corruption and under development of the state. Re-entry of Sheikh Abdullah in state politics in 1975 under an agreement with then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi and subsequent Rajiv-Farooq accord and Rahul-Omar bonhomie gave a new fillip to the demand for greater autonomy and saw rise of jihadi and radical forces in Kashmir.
The historic decision of August 5, 2019 is the result of the struggle and sacrifices of three generations of Praja Parishad, Jan Sangh & BJP workers. BJP as successor of Jan Sangh remained focussed and committed to abolition of Article 370 and full integration of the state with India. Many accused BJP of using it only as an election plank to woo voters in the Hindi heartland but all of them have been proved wrong.

J&K unit of BJP recently held a function to honour the activists and family members of those who were associated with the Praja Parishad agitation. A noble gesture to recognise the sacrifices and contributions of those great men whose dream of full integration of the State has at last been achieved.
My effort at recollecting history will be incomplete without acknowledging the hard work and dedicated effort of Kul Bhushan Mahotra, incharge Library Department of state BJP who has compiled three books which will prove as a treasure for those who want to study in detail the genesis of the Praja Parishad movement and abolition of Article 370.

(The author is a Jammu based political commentator and columnist. The article is based on personal accounts and available literature. He can be contacted at anil5457@gmail)
Brig Veteran Anil Gupta

Hits: 13


FATAH: Pakistan threatens the world with nuclear war

Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan addresses the 74th session of the United Nations General Assembly at U.N. headquarters in New York, on Sept. 27, 2019.Brendan Mcdermid / Reuters

Not since 1956 when Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev threatened the West with the infamous words, “We will bury you” have world leaders heard the head of a nuclear state brandish its atomic weapons to intimidate the world.

Almost 60 years after Khrushchev said these words at a reception in Moscow while addressing Western ambassadors, the Islamic State of Pakistan was back at the centre of the world’s attention as its prime minister raised the spectre of a nuclear war engulfing the globe.

Last Friday, Imran Khan rose to address a poorly attended hall of the UN General Assembly and in a not-so-disguised threat said, if the world did not pay attention to his penchant for a jihad against neighbouring India over the Indian state of Kashmir, a nuclear war would ensue and engulf the rest of the world:

“If a conventional war starts between the two countries … anything could happen. But supposing a country [Pakistan] seven times smaller than its neighbour [India] is faced with the choice either you surrender, or you fight for your freedom till death? “What will we do? I ask myself this question … and we will fight. … and when a nuclear-armed country fights to the end, it will have consequences far beyond the borders.”

Khan warned of a “blood bath” in Kashmir, where New Delhi has taken steps to fully integrate the territory with the rest of the country by amending the country’s constitution that hitherto had granted greater autonomy to the region than that given to the other 29 Indian states.

The Pakistani prime minister positioned himself as leader of the Islamic world and thus having authority to speak on behalf of India’s Kashmiri Muslims. In a provocative remark, Khan posed a rhetorical question: “Would I want to live like that?” Then answering his own question, he declared, “I would pick up a gun.”

And then to claim plausible deniability, he backtracked to say: “I am not threatening here about a nuclear war; it is a worry. It is a test for the United Nations. You are the one who said Kashmir has the right to self-determination. This is not the time for appeasement like that in 1939 in Munich.”

Was Imran Khan equating the world’s largest democracy India with Nazi Germany? Was he making a parallel between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Adolf Hitler?

Outrageous as it may sound, but, yes the man known as ‘Taliban Khan’ did accuse the Indian leader of being a fascist just as Pakistani-Americans on the streets of New York roamed around with posters showing Mr. Modi as Hitler, chanting “Allah O Akbar” as they attacked and browbeat anti-Jihadi exiles from Balochistan and Sindh who were protesting human rights violations inside the Islamic State of Pakistan.

The threats of nuclear war by Imran Khan were met with a calm response from Indian diplomat Vidisha Maitra. Addressing the General Assembly in her right of reply to Khan, she said: “Prime Minister Imran Khan’s threat of unleashing nuclear devastation, qualifies as brinksmanship, not statesmanship. Even coming from the leader of a country that has monopolized the entire value chain of the industry of terrorism, Prime Minister Khan’s justification of terrorism was brazen and incendiary.”

And in response to the Pakistan Prime Minister’s declaration that “There is no God, but Allah,” the Indian diplomat said: “Unfortunately, what we heard today from Prime Minister Imran Khan of Pakistan was a callous portrayal of the world in binary terms. Us vs Them; … Muslims vs Others. A script that fosters divisiveness at the United Nations. Attempts to sharpen differences and stir up hatred, are simply put – hate speech.”


Massive China police drill raises fears in Hong Kong

VEILED THREAT? Footage shows thousands of cops tackling mock protesters in hats and face masks

BEIJING/HONGKONG: Thousands of Chinese riot police staged a drill just across the border from Hong Kong, in what appeared to be a thinly veiled warning from Beijing about its ability to end two months of protests in the global financial hub.

AFP■ Photo taken on Tuesday shows Chinese paramilitary police officers taking part in a drill in Shenzhen, across the border from Hong Kong.

The exercise, which took place on Tuesday in Shenzhen – a city in southern China that borders the semi-autonomous city – instantly attracted online attention given the close resemblance between the drill and the ongoing clashes in adjacent Hong Kong.

The footage showed squads of police facing down “protesters” dressed in construction hats and face masks – reminiscent of demonstrators in Hong Kong.

As the crowd attacked police with long, wooden poles, officers pushed back with riot shields and deployed tear gas.

“All police forces in Shenzhen are always ready!” Shenzhen police wrote in an online post about Tuesday’s drills, which it said involved 12,000 police officers.

CHINA: BIGGEST CRISIS SINCE 1997 HANDOVER Hong Kong is facing its “most severe situation” since its handover from British rule in 1997 following weeks of demonstrations and the central government is considering what measures to take next, the head of Beijing’s Cabinet office responsible for the territory said on Wednesday.

Zhang Xiaoming was speaking to Hong Kong residents attending a seminar in the mainland city of Shenzhen.

The protests are having “an increasingly broad impact on society”, Zhang told the 500 attendees, who included members of the Hong Kong and central government legislative and advisory bodies. “It can be said that Hong Kong is facing the most severe situation it has faced since the handover,” Zhang said.


Nuclear weapons not made for war-fighting, says Indian army chief Bipin Rawat

NEW DELHI: Indian army chief General Bipin Rawat and Indian air force head Air Chief Marshal RKS Bhadauria last week once again threatened Pakistan with strikes, whipping up war-hysteria over occupied Kashmir.

According to a report by Indian daily The Times of India, the top Indian commander said that Indian troops would go across the Line of Control, referencing a controversial strike in Balakot that Pakistan claims only shelled some trees.

In response to a question about the use of nuclear weapons, General Rawat said that nuclear weapons were not weapons of war fighting, and that those proclaiming they would use them in conventional warfare were not in a right state of mind.

“They are not weapons for war fighting. I find it difficult to comprehend when someone proclaims he will use them for conventional war fighting or if he is attacked. Will the world community ever allow you to use nuclear weapons like this?,” he questioned, according to TOI.

Earlier in September, Indian air force chief Air Chief Marshal RKS Bhadauria had said that the Indian air force was ready for action against Pakistan and had purchased the new Rafale aircraft in this context.

“Rafale is a very capable aircraft, once we induct it, it will be a game-changer in terms of our operational capability. It will give us an edge over Pakistan and China,” Bhadauria told Indian media after taking over as Indian air force chief last month.


Pak downgrades ties, India unfazed Suspends trade | Partially closes air space | No word on Kartarpur corridor

http://

Sandeep Dikshit

Tribune News Service

New Delhi, August 7

India opted not to respond to a series of measures announced by Pakistan on Wednesday as a fallout of Parliament approving the reorganisation of Jammu and Kashmir into two Union Territories. Pakistan has asked India to withdraw its High Commissioner Ajay Bisaria and, for now, decided not to send its new High Commissioner to take up his India posting.

Late in the evening, Pakistan ordered changes in routes by Indian flights through its airspace. India, on its part, issued a security alert at 19 airports and deployed additional security personnel apart from regular deployment at airports. Sources said the closure of one air corridor requiring a maximum of 12 minutes of diversion would not really affect airlines.

After the second meeting in a week of the National Security Committee comprising top Cabinet Ministers and Pakistan Army officers, Pakistan today suspended bilateral trade and decided to step up diplomatic outreach, including approaching the UN and UN Security Council over Kashmir.

Sources said Pakistan was off the mark in taking these measures and that Pakistan had no locus standi to interfere in what was entirely India’s internal matter.

Reacting to reports of UN-blacklisted terrorist Hafiz Saeed’s conviction, the sources said they were trying to ascertain details. “We have to know if he was really convicted and on what charges. We also have to find out the appeals process and whether he will be let off during the pendency of the appeal.”

Pakistan will also review bilateral arrangements and observe its Independence Day on August 14 in solidarity with the “brave Kashmiris and their just struggle for their right of self-determination”. India’s Independence Day on August 15 will be observed as a “Black Day”, resolved Pakistan’s National Security Committee. There is, however, no word on the fate of Kartarpur corridor.

The Pakistan PM has directed that all diplomatic channels be activated to launch a broadside against India.

Pak’s 5-pt offensive

  • Downgrades diplomatic ties
  • Suspends bilateral trade
  • Reviews bilateral measures
  • To go to UN Security Council
  • Aug 14 as J&K ‘solidarity day’

Letter to President

The All-Party Action Committee, Kargil, on Wednesdaywrote to the President, seeking immediate restoration of Article 370, 35-A, describing the Centre’s decision a “coup against India’s Constitution”

Mufti asks PDP MPs to resign 

  • Former CM Mehbooba Mufti has asked the two PDP members to resign from the Rajya Sabha
  • PDP’s Mir Fayaz and Nazir Ahmed Laway were on Monday physically removed from the House after they tore a copy of the Constitution, expressing their anger against the government move to scrap Article 370

Army officer reviews security arrangements in forward areas

Army officer reviews security arrangements in forward areas

Western Army Commander Lt Gen RP Singh along with GOC Golden Arrow Division during a visit to forward area.

Our Correspondent

Ferozepur, September 29

The Western Army Commander, Lieutenant General RP Singh, yesterday visited the forward areas under the command of Golden Arrow Division to review the operational preparedness of the Army.

Major General Amit Loomba, GOC, Golden Arrow Division, and other senior officials of the formation briefed the GOC-in-C.

While interacting with the senior officers and troops, Lieutenant General Singh asked them to remain prepared to respond to any challenge at any time. During his visit to the station, the Army Commander appreciated the development works and multifarious measures undertaken by the division for the welfare of troops. He complimented the efforts put in by the division for addressing the long-pending issues of ex-servicemen and “Veer Naaris”. He urged all ranks to continue to maintain highest standard of operational preparedness and training in sync with the legacy of the division. Senior officials from the command and Vajra Corps accompanied him.

 


Air Commodore Tejbir Singh takes over as AOC, 12 Wing

Air Commodore Tejbir Singh takes over as AOC, 12 Wing

Air Commodore Tejbir Singh (right) after taking over as the Air Officer Commanding, 12 Wing, from Air Commodore S Srinivasan in Chandigarh on Monday. Tribune photo

Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, August 5

Air Commodore Tejbir Singh assumed charge as the Air Officer Commanding (AOC), 12 Wing, here today. He takes over from Air Commodore S Srinivasan, who has moved to the Western Air Command Headquarters.

A ceremonial parade was held at the Air Force Station, Chandigarh, to mark the change of guard.

Commissioned into the Indian Air Force (IAF) on December 17, 1988, Air Commodore Tejbir Singh is an alumnus of the National Defence Academy.

He has earlier commanded Air Force Station, Yelehanka, and is the Commodore Commandant of a premier flying squadron. He has been decorated with the Ati Vishisht Seva Medal and the Vishisht Seva Medal for distinguished services.