An Indian Army vehicle moves outside their camp after militants attacked the camp on Saturday, in Jammu. Reuters

Jammu, February 11

A National Investigation Agency (NIA) team on Sunday visited the Sunjuwan Army camp attacked by a group of Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) terrorists and examined the evidence collected by the Army from the site of the gun battle, an official said.Six people, including five Army personnel, were killed while ten others were injured in the attack by JeM terrorists.Three terrorists were also killed in retaliatory action as the operation which began yesterday continued for a second day inside the sprawling military station along the Jammu- Pathankot bypass here.Though a case has not been registered yet, the NIA team inspected the encounter site inside the camp and examined the evidence collected by the Army, the official said, on condition of anonymity.The NIA is mandated to probe all terror-related cases in the country as per an act of Parliament.NIA is already investigating the November 2016 Nagrota attack case in which seven Army personnel, including two officers, and three terrorists were killed.It has already submitted a charge-sheet in the Pathankot air base attack case in which it had named JeM founder Masood Azhar as an accused.The attack on the Pathankot air base took place on the intervening night of January 1-2, 2016. It claimed the lives of seven security personnel. Four terrorists were also gunned down by the security forces while repulsing the attack.Since this (Sunjuwan) attack was also the handiwork of JeM terrorists, the NIA is looking for its link with previous cases which will help them in building a stronger case against Azhar and India can make a firm case at the United Nations, the official said. — PTI

Union Home Minister Rajnath Singh

Tribune News Service

New Delhi, February 10

With the Ministry of Home Affairs claiming that it has been closely monitoring the situation emerging out of the terror attack at Sunjuwan Army camp in Jammu, Union Home Minister Rajnath Singh today said the forces were effectively doing their job and would never let any Indian hang his head in shame.Talking to mediapersons on the sidelines of an event in Ahmedabad, Rajnath  said, “We have received information that the operation is going on. I understand that until the operation ends, it will not be appropriate on my part to comment.” Two Junior Commissioned Officers (JCOs) were killed while a Colonel-rank officer and daughter of an Army man were among the four people injured in a militant attack on the Sunjuwan Army camp in Jammu early today.When asked specifically about the casualties, the minister said it was “sad”.Earlier in the day, the Home Minister spoke to DG SP Vaid of the J&K Police and took stock of the situation. 

Army personnel take their positions in Sunjuwan area on the second day of terrorist attack in Jammu on Sunday. Tribune photo: Inderjeet Singh

A military tank takes its position outside family quarters in Sunjuwan, Jammu, on the second day of a terrorist strike at an army camp on Sunday. Tribune photo: Inderjeet Sing

Tribune News Service
Sunjuwan (Jammu), February 11

A shootout with some armed gunmen that began when they stormed an army camp in Jammu’s Sunjuwan in a pre-dawn strike on Saturday has left six people—five soldiers and one civilian— as well as three militants dead, a defence spokesperson said.

(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)

Defence spokesperson Lt Col Devender Anand confirmed three heavily armed militants—suspected to belong to Jaish-e-Mohammad— had been killed.

All three gunmen were dressed in military fatigues.

There are unconfirmed reports of two more militants being gunned down.

Among the 10 wounded are six women and a 14-year-old boy. The latter was hit in the head with a bullet and is believed to be critical.

Also among the injured is a pregnant woman who later delivered a baby. Both are believed stable.

Search operation at the camp is still ongoing. The defence spokesperson said that security forces found heavy arms and ammunition.

A group of heavily armed gunmen attacked the sprawling camp of the 36 brigade of Jammu and Kashmir Light Infantry early on Saturday.

Two Army personnel, including a Junior Commissioned Officer (JCO), were killed on Saturday.
Lt Col Devender Anand said a number of families were still there and the Army’s aim was to ensure their safety.

“There was no firing since last night,” the officer said.

Those who were killed have been identified as Subedar Madan Lal Choudhary; Subedar Mohd Ashraf Mir; Ha. Habib-Ullah Qurashi; Naik Manzoor Ahmed; Lance Naik Mohd lqbal . A civilian, Lance Naik Iqbal’s father, also died in the operation.

Lt. Col. Rohit Solanki of 6th Mahar; Lance Naik Bahadur Singh of 1st Jammu and Kashmir Light Infantry; Hay Abdul Hamid Rashid of 1st Jammu and Kashmir Light Infantry; and Subedar Rajinder Singh of 6th Mahar were injured.

Six civilians were also wounded, among them a pregnant woman.

Read: Residents woken up by gunshots, grenade blastsThe latest attack on the camp took place nearly 15 months after the Jammu region was hit by a similar attack. On November 29, 2016, terrorists had stormed the Army’s Nagrota camp on the outskirts of Jammu city, killing seven Army personnel, including two officers. Three terrorists were also gunned down.

The terrorists had struck before dawn on Saturday and managed to sneak into the camp from the rear side of the base after a brief exchange of fire with the sentry on its periphery.

“The terrorists entered the family accommodation complex after which quick response teams cordoned off the area and isolated the terrorists, who are holed up in a few houses (inside the camp),” officials said.

While there was no action around the main entrance and vehicles were moving along the Jammu-Lakhanpur bypass in front of the camp, Army personnel in bullet-proof vehicles engaged in the operation to rescue people from the family quarters in the rear side of the base.

Contingents of CRPF and police were posted outside the boundary wall and were keeping curious onlookers at bay to avoid civilian casualties.

A high alert has been sounded in Jammu and security beefed up in and around the city.

Intelligence inputs had warned of an attack on an Army or security establishment by Jaish-e-Mohammed in view of the death anniversary of Afzal Guru who was hanged on February 9, 2013.

Meanwhile, Leader of Opposition in Rajya Sabha Ghulam Nabi Azad and some other senior Congress leaders visited Military Hospital to enquire after those wounded in the attack. With PTI

Majid Jahangir &

Samaan Lateef

Tribune News Service

Srinagar, February 6

In an audacious attack inside Srinagar’s main health care facility, a Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT) commander, a Pakistani who is believed to have met Mumbai attacker Ajmal Kasab at a training camp, today fled from custody, handcuffed. The attack took place at 11.38 am. Escorted by three policemen, six prisoners, including Naveed Jatt, alias Abu Hanzalla, lodged at the Srinagar Central Jail, were brought in a vehicle to Shri Maharaja Hari Singh Hospital (SMHS) for a checkup. As Naveed got down, Head Constable Mushtaq Ahmad (48) and Babar Ahmad Khan (34) were shot dead.(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)Piecing together eyewitness accounts and CCTV footage, the police said two militants were lying in wait at the parking lot of the hospital OPD. As soon as the police vehicle drove in, a pheran-clad youth handed a pistol to Naveed, who pumped bullets into Head Constable Mushtaq Ahmad’s chest. Babar Ahmad tried to retaliate but in vain. While Mushtaq died almost immediately, the latter succumbed to his injuries hours later.The militants are believed to have escaped on a motor bike. “It seems information on Naveed’s movement was leaked out from the central jail,” state police chief Shesh Paul Vaid said. DGP, Prisons, SK Mishra has ordered an internal inquiry.Naveed, the deputy of Lashkar’s Abu Qasim, the mastermind of several deadly attacks, was arrested in Kulgam district in June 2014. A school dropout from Borevella district of Multan, he is believed to have been involved in the attack on the Army in Hyderpora, on Silver Star Hotel along the national highway outside Srinagar and three attacks on the police and CRPF camps in south Kashmir.The police wanted to shift him, along with five other prisoners, to other high-security jails outside the Valley but was disallowed by a sessions court on December 26, 2017.  (With PTI inputs)

Top defence manufacturers line up to sell their cutting-edge weapon system at a time when the govt has fine-tuned its procurement policy that lays overwhelming stress on local manufacturing. That’s easier said than done in the absence of local infrastructure and fears about secrecy

New guns coming: A soldier walks past rifles during a rehearsal for the Republic Day parade. The glitch-prone Insas rifles are going to be replaced. file photos: Manas Ranjan Bhui and Agencies

The Dhanush heavy artillery gun

he Rudra attack helicopter

Ajay Banerjee in New DelhiEminent defence data analyst Global Firepower Index says the Indian military has a combined 4,207,250 active and reserve personnel in service. Various defence groups rate India’s military as one of the top five biggest in the world. India is also the world’s largest importer of weapons and military equipment, accounting for 13% of all such international imports, according to the Sweden-based think-tank Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) in its report. Lined up before the country are the top defence manufacturers ever since the BJP came to power in 2014 and promised to open up the sector through ‘Make in India’ route. The objective is not only to generate thousands of jobs but also replace obsolete equipment and offer the best weapons and platforms to the defence forces. That has not been simple in the absence of adequate manufacturing ecosystem, veils of secrecy in a severe bureaucratic environment and dithering among some manufacturers to part with sensitive cutting-edge technology. Nevertheless, arms manufacturing companies see it as a golden chance. Sample this: 

• Europe’s Airbus Group wants to sell its Panther helicopter. It says if it wins a contract, it would make India its global hub for the multi-purpose choppers. The company currently builds them at Marignane in France.
• Lockheed Martin says if its F-16 fighter jets are selected (it may compete with Saab for a $15 billion order) it will “support the advancement of Indian manufacturing expertise”.
• Germany’s ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems and France’s Naval Group want to vie for a contract of up to $10 billion to build submarines in a South Asian country.

It is clear India imports at least 90% of its defence equipment. It is banking on foreign companies to bring in new technology. The lowest bid is one key selection factor that worries some of the competitors. “We’d like to see the Indian government work with the US government to ensure that these acquisition policies don’t disadvantage US firms just because we can’t get the lowest price,” Cara Abercrombie, former US deputy assistant secretary of defence for southeast Asia, told a panel in New York.The procurement model

India’s attempt to join the nations producing world-class military equipment hinges on a new policy: ‘strategic partnership (SP) model’. Production of four crucial military items fighter jets (both for the Navy and IAF), submarines, helicopters (for all three services) and new-generation tanks are listed under this model, all cutting-edge equipment needed in a battle.The ‘SP model’ allows the Ministry of Defence (MoD) to select an Indian private company to collaborate with a foreign partner and produce military equipment in India. On paper, it looks fine, but technology transfer is tricky.In May last year — ending almost two years of discussions with industry and experts — the Modi government cleared the SP model. It was made a part of defence procurement procedure (DPP), the guiding framework of making military equipment in India.The red-tape

Why should MoD select and nominate an Indian partner for foreign companies some of whom are in the Fortune 500 list? It is a question often asked in industry circles. For the Indian companies, this clause could create a monopoly. The ideal situation should be to allow a foreign company to select its own partner from a bunch of Indian companies cleared by the MoD. It has seen some success and also failures. The Rs-32,000 crore ‘Make in India’ project to build 12 advanced minesweepers for the Navy with a South Korean firm was cancelled in January this year. An artillery programme for specialized artillery guns, the K-9 Vajra, has moved forward. The plan to include new rifles for the Army has been on the drawing board for long. Several rounds of talks later, 72,400 rifles have been cleared and the remaining 6.5 lakh will be purchased from eligible Indian vendors in tie-up with foreign manufacturer. Bullet-proof jackets are being made in India. On Jan 16, defence minister Nirmala Sitharaman allowed direct proposals from builders instead of the existing system of the MoD sending out a request for information. The industry, start-ups or individuals can suggest their projects, as per a list put out by the armed forces. The industry can also have a foreign tie-up to the tune of 49% foreign holding. Ready for a long haulSeveral big-tickets items are listed to be ‘made in India. In reality it could take years for them to fructify. It’d also reflect if India can shed the position of being a leading arms importer or continues to be dependent on others for technology. The SP-model can help in building a military industrial complex and a failure could leave India still struggling with technology. Whatever decisions Sitharaman takes will decide timelines of new inductions and the quantum of transfer of technology offered by foreign partners to their Indian counterparts.Since the new policy was announced, the MoD has invited and studied proposals for the ‘Make in India’ six stealth submarines costing Rs 75,000 crore. Four major global players — Naval Group-DCNS (France), ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems (Germany), Rosoboronexport Design Bureau (Russia) and Saab Kockums (Sweden) are vying to bag contracts running into thousands of crores. The MoD has asked global helicopter makers to send in their bids to make a total of 234 copters for the Indian Navy. These copters will be of two types, 123 naval multi-role helicopters (NMRH) with anti-submarine warfare (ASW) capabilities, and another 111 armed light naval utility helicopters (NUH). The two contracts are estimated to cost nearly $10 billion (Rs 65,000 crore). Overall, 1,000 copters are needed; some 400 are being built by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) under two separate projects, one with the Russians and another of its own.The next big buys

• In Nov 2017, the Army sent out a global bid for 1,770 Future Ready Combat Vehicle (FRCV) — a fancy name for a tank
• India is looking for some 200 single-engine jets for which talks have been conducted under the ‘SP-model’
• The ministry has placed an order for 114 pieces of Dhanush, a variation of the Bofors design and transfer of technology. The Army is carrying out exploitation-trials
• The desi-made Advanced Towed Artillery Gun System, jointly developed by DRDO and the private sector, has completed winter trials
• Army’s Field Artillery Rationalization Plan aims to acquire 2,800-3,000 155 mm/52-calibre guns of all kinds and 155 mm/39-calibre lightweight howitzers by 2027

The big ‘if’ in FDI 

• On July 25, 2017 the ministry said there been a mere Rs 1.13 lakh crore FDI in the defence sector in the past three years
• In Sept, secretary of defence (production) Ashok Gupta (now retired) speaking at the US-India Strategic Partnership Forum said: “The government would be open to consider 100% FDI in defence, should a company be willing to provide full technology transfer”
• 100% FDI is allowed in defence sector, out of which up to 49% is under automatic route. FDI above 49% is permitted through govt route on a case-to-case basis

The collaborations

• Single-engine fighter jet Tejas is powered by US-produced General Electric engines
• The Arjun tank runs on German engines and over 30% of it has German parentage
• The latest version of Dhruv helicopter, now tasked for Siachen ops, flies on Snemca engines from France
• The Shivalik-class warships are designed in India, but are powered by French Pielstick engines. These warships used steel produced by Steel Authority of India
• Italian shipbuilder Fincantieri helped in design but used Indian steel for Vikrant, the under-construction sea-borne aircraft carrier. The engines are from General Electric, US
• N-powered submarines Arihant & Arighat are first such vessels constructed outside the five permanent members of the UNSC. While Russia helped in design, the main hull was built by India’s L&T
• The Scorpene Submarine is classic example of a joint venture with France
• Russian equipment such as Sukhoi 30MKI fighter jets and T-90 tanks are licence-produced in India

Besides a mechanism to discuss border tensions, India and China also have special representative-level border talks to resolve the differences over the disputed border.

Beijing, January 29

India and China should look at their border differences, including over Dokalam, in a “calm way” and resolve them through existing mechanisms, the Chinese foreign ministry said on Monday.Reacting to Indian Ambassador to China Gautam Bambawale’s interview to Chinese daily, the Global Times, where he said the status quo should not be changed along the sensitive areas of the 3,488-km border, Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying said here that differences could be addressed through existing mechanisms.“Indeed we have noted that the ambassador talked about it while addressing the issue,” she said.

(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)

“I should say the two sides should look at border issues in a calm way and resolve relevant issues through the existing border-related mechanisms so that we can create conditions and enabling environment to properly solve our differences,” she said.Besides a mechanism to discuss border tensions, India and China also have special representative-level border talks to resolve the differences over the disputed border.About the new satellite imagery showing buildup by both sides, Hua reiterated that Dokalam, over which Bhutan also claims sovereignty, is Chinese territory and said China is building facilities in the area.She referred to the 1890 treaty between the UK and China and said “the Sikkim section of the China-India boundary has been demarcated by historic treaty and treaty under effective jurisdiction of China”.“China has always upheld our sovereignty along the border area including (Dokalam) Donglang,” she said.About the satellite imagery, she said, “I should stress it (area) falls within China’s sovereignty that we conduct facility building in Donglang area.”“Some Indian media have carried reports about the military buildup and infrastructure building in the area. They are very excited about it,” she said.India and China ended a tense 73-day standoff on August 28 last year at Dokalam area after the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) stopped building a strategic road close to India’s narrow Chicken’s Neck area connecting the northeastern states.
Bhutan also claims the Dokalam area to be its part.About the local commanders’ meeting held on Republic Day during which they exchanged pleasantries, Hua said, “The local military personnel and border troops of the two sides held a meeting on India’s Republic Day.”“We think this is conducive to enhancing mutual trust and upholding peace stability along the border areas. We are also willing to enhance our communication and cooperation to better safeguard the security there and to create a better environment in this regard,” she said.About the ambassador’s comments that India and China are partners, not rivals, and both sides should carry out dialogue at all levels, she said “the Chinese government’s position remains consistent”.As two neighbours in Asia and major developing countries, the two sides should treat each other as an opportunity for development, she said.“It is also a consensus reached by the leaders of the two countries. We will surely treat India as our cooperation partner and we hope to enhance people-to-people ties and friendship through such communication exchanges and to enhance our mutual trust so that we can lay more solid foundation and public support for our bilateral relations. In this we can create better conditions to resolve our differences,” she said. PTI

The most threatening crisis facing India is that of population explosion. But how many MPs have raised this issue in Parliament? We also lag in areas of poverty, sanitation, infrastructure development and economic reforms.

RN Malik

Retired engineer-in-chief, Public Health Department, HaryanaOn this Republic Day, roughly 260 million people are living below the poverty line under very dehumanising conditions. An equal number, called marginally poor, live just above that line. Their progeny is born sick and suffer from nutritional problems throughout their lives. The life of people falling in the lower middle income group is also not free from miseries and struggles. Now rich are getting richer and the poor poorer. Insanitation and corruption have become omnipresent. The purpose of demonetisation stands defeated because anybody can draw any amount from the bank to use it for bribery. In fact, it was done to remove the tag of ‘Soot-boot Ki Sarkar’. Business in Sadar-Bazars is still being conducted in ‘Number-2′. Healthcare is on the verge of collapse. Major cities have become virtual gas chambers. Indices for Human Development Index and Ease of Doing Business are very low (134 and 90, respectively). Farmers are committing suicides. Progress in hydro power and water resources development (the backbone of agriculture) is notional. Infrastructure development is tardy. The amount of non-recoverable loans has gone up to Rs 10 lakh crore. The amount of stressed loans may be even more. The quality of engineering and medical education has touched a new low. All states are debt-ridden. The FDRI Bill will create trust deficit among depositors. The GDP growth of 7 to 8 per cent is putative and jobless. When asked to bend, the media chooses to crawl, with few exceptions. The poll bonds scheme is glossed with opacity. POSCO is sitting idle in Orissa for 13 years to set up a big iron plant. Air India and power utilities are under heavy debts. Insanitation and financial crunch mar the Railways. Damage to the reputation of judiciary is now beyond redemption after the press conference of the four Supreme Court judges. These are all clear signs of a failed nation.Look at the developed nations. They were ravaged during the World War II. Poland was annihilated. Japan was bombed and burnt. But these countries were able to stand on their own feet within 15 years. China was raped and ravaged by Japanese forces for 10 years. Then the Cultural Revolution of Mao killed 70 million people in 1950. Its economy was in a shambles till 1978 and GDP growth in 1961 was -27.2%. Then the doughty Deng Xiaoping came and transformed China into the third largest economy in the world.On the other hand, people in under-developed countries are struggling with abject poverty because they are reeling under a corrupt and rotten political system. Rot in India’s body politic started in 1966 after the death of LB Shastri. The usurping and corrupt political class gradually polluted the bureaucracy and destroyed meritocracy. The political class is flushed with time-servers, sycophants and power-hungry people. As many as 33 per cent legislators are tinged with criminal records. It is operating like some kind of a mafia and is busy practising divisive, disruptive, dynastic and vote bank politics to rule and befool the people. The main avocation of ruling parties has been to throw crumbs to the poor in the form of freebies. High hopes were raised when Narendra Modi came on the national scene in 2014. Now his 42-month rule has belied all such hopes. Rhetorics like Skill India or New India do not enchant people anymore. The PM has become more pompous than a pragmatic doer. The Gujarat model was deflated recently when it was revealed that farmers’ community was in dire straits. Only projects of national highways, coal mining, freight corridors, metro and providing sanitary toilets to make India open defecation-free are making good progress. But this is not enough, considering the demands of the time. A strong impression is building up that the BJP rules India and the RSS rules the BJP. Buses and buildings are being given a saffron coat.  The job of a visionary prime minister is to draw a precise roadmap to ensure eradication of poverty and remove the ‘under-developed’ tag in the least possible time. No PM has followed this cardinal principle  after Nehru. Instead of raising the slogan of “Garibi Mukt Bharat “, Modi raised “Congress Mukt Bharat” which speaks of an attitude of the worst kind of demagoguery. According to Jeffrey Sachh, the four keys to open the doors of prosperity for a nation are strict population control, sanitation, infrastructure development and administrative and economic reforms. China did that and transformed itself into an economic powerhouse. It completed its 18,200-MW Three Gorges Dam in just six years. (Total installed capacity of NHPC since 1982 is 6,500 MW). The most threatening crisis facing India is of population explosion. Now it is 132 crore. We are adding one Australia every year and, at this rate, it will be 150 crore in 2027 and thoroughly unmanageable. But, how many MPs have raised the issue of the looming demographic disaster in Parliament or waging war against poverty? The PM has never called a meeting of the CMs to discuss the strategy of economic development.  The CMs are treating the states as their fiefs. The Parliament has become an exhibition of mudslinging matches among different parties, bedlam and adjournments. The MPs and MLAs behave like brothers only when it comes to enhancing their own emoluments.Communal flare-ups like the one in Pune and violent reservation movements are only a trailer of the anarchy waiting to happen. The country is in a now-or-never situation. This is the only time to take up radical  measures. But unfortunately, there is a famine of visionary leaders like Sardar Patel or Xiaoping or Lee Kuan Yiew who can steer the country out of the mess. 

The Border Roads Organisation clears a road in Srinagar. File photo

Vijay Mohan

Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, January 21

There have been significant shortfalls in achievement of targets in the execution of various projects during the past two fiscal years by tasks forces of the Border Roads Organisation (BRO) deployed in the volatile Kashmir valley.While allocated funds have been spent by 97.71 per cent and 93.32 per cent during the 2015-16 and 2016-17 fiscals, respectively, the target achieved was as low as 14.32 per cent in some of the categories of works, an audit report finalised this month has revealed.“It is quite evident that the targets assigned by the Headquarters Director General, Border Roads, has not been achieved by 760 Task Force, in spite of expenditure to the tune of Rs 10,952.64 lakh against the allotment of Rs 11,208.79 lakh in 2015-16 and Rs 10,220.20 lakh against the allotment of Rs 10,951.04 lakh in 2016-17,” the report states. The 760 Border Roads Task Force functions under BRO’s Project Beacon in Jammu and Kashmir.While the Task Force exceeded its bridge construction target in 2016-17, which amounted to 122.80 per cent, it was just 19.85 in the preceding fiscal. The performance in resurfacing works also flip-flopped from 99.99 per cent in 2015-16 to just 29.43 per cent in 2016-17.The report also pointed out that in one instance of road formation works, 66.20 per cent of the allocated funds had been spent, but the physical progress had been only 38.53 per cent. The contractor asked for an extension which was more than the original time period.An infructuous expenditure to the tune of Rs 3,094.98 lakh due to foreclosure of jobs has also been flagged. Further, the audit also revealed that a total of 14 jobs amounting to Rs 843.49 lakh are still lying unsanctioned since 2007. Noticeably, these are those which were to be commenced urgently before the issue of administrative approval, where local engineering authorities opine that delay in works may endanger life and property.

Unmet objectives  

• While allocated funds have been spent by 97.71 per cent and 93.32 per cent during the 2015-16 and 2016-17 fiscals, respectively, the target achieved was as low as 14.32 per cent in some of the categories of works, an audit report finalised this month has revealed.
• While the Task Force exceeded its bridge construction target in 2016-17, which amounted to 122.80 per cent, it was just 19.85 in the preceding fiscal. The performance in resurfacing works also flip-flopped from 99.99 per cent in 2015-16 to just 29.43 per cent in 2016-17.