Sanjha Morcha

OROP

Dear Sir,
1. It appears CGDA spring some surprise or the other with sole aim to convince Min of Def (ESW) to abolish OROP altogether by showing that anomalies creep in and some retired post – OROP 2013 get lesser pension than those benefited by OROP-2013.
2. Thanks to Air Mshl SY Savur (Retd) who fights for us by getting useful information through RTI Act, the information furnished by CGDA to Min of Def on anomaly of Officers retired in the period Jul 2014 to Dec 2015 getting less pension than those got benefited by OROP – 2013. The details given by CGDA is as under:-
(a) 94.3% of Lt Cols retired in the period Jul 2014 and Dec 2015 draw less pension than OROP – 2013 retirees.
(b) 78.02% of Lt Cols retired in the period Post – 2016 draw less pension than OROP – 2013 retirees.
(c) 8.25% of Brigadiers retired in the period Jul 2014 and Dec 2015 draw less pension than OROP – 2013 retirees.
(d) 0.42% of Brigadiers retired in the period Post – 2016 draw less pension than OROP – 2013 retirees
3. I have received details of pension by these two ranked officers retired Post – Jul 2014. I contest the figures of CGDA that large percentage of Lt Cols retired post – OROP 2013 draw less pension than OROP – 2013 beneficiaries. The facts I collected from retired officers state otherwise. Very few Lt Cols retired in the period Post – Jul 2014 receive less pension. Only 2 out of 10 Lt Cols in my database retired in the period Jul 2014 to Dec 2015 got lesser pension. Details of such Lt Cols and Brigadiers are put in TSEWA Blog at www.tsewa.org.
4. Regarding Brigadiers none got lesser pension than those benefited by OROP – 2013. Even CGDA refer the number of such Brigadiers who draw less pension is very few. My data is shown below and you will notice not even one Brigadier / Commodore / Air Cmde drew less pension: –
Request
5. The aim of CGDA is to deny OROP – 2018 showing as if OROP gives less pension to those who are out of OROP benefit i.e. Post – Jul 2014 retirees who are not benefited by OROP – 2013. In any scheme of things some will gain and some will lose. CGDA should have brought this anomaly of Post Jul 2014 pensioners getting less pension and advised Min of Def (ESW) to issue instructions to make their pension equal to that in OROP – 2013. The aim of OROP is to bridge gap between pensioners retired in varying time periods.
6. I need more PPOs / E-PPOs of Lt Cols and Brigadiers retired in the period Jul 2014 and Jun 2019 (five years) to prove claim of CGDA at para 2 is wrong.
7. Min of Def (ESW) may be convinced with the argument of CGDA and may recommend to the Union Cabinet to abolish OROP altogether. We need to confront CGDA and Min of Def (ESW) with facts.
8. I therefore request Lt Cols and Brigadiers who retired from Jul 2014 to Jun 2019 to scan and send me your PPOs to my e-mail id : csvidyasagar@gmail.com as CGDA may ask for authentication. PPOs / E-PPOs are the authentication. Sometimes due to poor scanning, PPOs are illegible. In that case kindly give me the following information: –
(a) Service No.
(b) Rank.
© Name as given in PPO.
(d) Qualifying Service as given in PPO.
(e) Date of Commission.
(f) Date of Retirement.
(g) Basic Pay at the time of Retirement as given in PPO.
(h) Pension sanctioned at the time of retirement as given in PPO.
(j) PPO No.
9. Kindly give this mail utmost importance to this issue. Unless we act with alacrity, we may lose OROP for which countless veteran waged relentless battle. Your immediate action is humbly requested. Also may I request you to circulate this mail to all your friends in other mail groups for faster dissemination and urge the Lt Col and Brigadiers retired in the period Jul 2014 and Jun 2019 (five years) to send me their E-PPOs or PPOs immediately to my e-mail id: csvidyasagar@gmail.com. I need some time to collect this information, collate yearwise and then send it. We have very little time as the Committee headed by CGDA constituted on 14 Jun 2019 to work out modality of OROP may recommend to abolish it altogether if we do not present our data.
Warm regards,
Brig CS Vidyasagar (Retd)
040-48540895
9493191380

Only 2 disputed spots along LAC in Ladakh

Only 2 disputed spots along LAC in Ladakh

in 2016, India, China carried out first joint military exercise in Ladakh.

Ajay Banerjee
Tribune News Service
New Delhi, August 7

China’s reaction to Ladakh becoming a Union Territory seems to be stemmed from the un-demarcated 823-km frontier. In reality, there are only two spots along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) recognised as disputed by India and China.

Another half-a-dozen spots along the LAC have troops patrolling as per their perception of the LAC, however, not a bullet has been fired since November 1962 in Ladakh. The difference in ‘perception’ is between 2 and 20 km at various points, hence the dispute.

“The reaction of Beijing was to make an on-record diplomatic protest as Aksai Chin, the north-eastern corner of now bifurcated state of J&K, is claimed by India even as China is in illegal custody,” said a senior functionary in the know of matters related to China.

China characterised the move as “unacceptable” and asked New Delhi to avoid actions that unilaterally change the status quo.

In Delhi, observers in the South Block point out there are only two disputed areas along the LAC. One is at Trig Heights located in the north-eastern edge of Ladakh and the other is Demchok, the south-eastern edge. Besides, tensions brew occasionally as both sides carry out patrolling along the northern edge of Pangong Tso (lake), Sppangur Gap, Kongka La, Chumur, Mount Sajun and Samar Lung pa. All these matters are being dealt at the level of the Special Representatives for boundary talks.

In 2016, the two countries carried out their first-ever joint military exercise at a tactical level in Ladakh. In September 2014, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, after a meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping, proposed the LAC demarcation on ground to end the dispute.

Historically, the frontier of Ladakh with Tibet has never been demarcated. The British took control of J&K in 1846 after defeating the Sikh Army. The British proposed boundaries — five separate ones in 1846, 1865, 1873, 1899 and 1914, China rejected each of them.

Major Alexandar Cunnigham, who was part of the British attempt in 1846 to demarcate the boundary, details this in his 1854 published book ‘Ladak Physical, Statistical and Geographical’. He narrates “The settlement of this boundary (between Ladakh and Tibet) was one of some importance”.

The existing LAC partially adheres to the 1873 British ‘foreign office line’ and is considered the most realistic on the internationally accepted principle that the water shed will decide the boundary. India’s point is the LAC lies along the alignment where its troops were in 1962 before the war commenced

 


India asks Pak to claim intruders’ bodies; Islamabad denies incursion

India asks Pak to claim intruders' bodies; Islamabad denies incursion

The Army had repulsed a major attempt by the Pakistan’s Border Action Team. Tribune file

Ajay Banerjee 
Tribune News Service
New Delhi, August 4

The Indian Army has offered the Pakistani Army to take over the dead bodies of its troops that are lying inside the Indian territory near Keran in north Kashmir.

The Pakistani Army has been offered to approach with a white flag and take over the dead bodies for last rites.

The Army had foiled an attack by Pakistan’s Border Action Team (BAT) on a forward post along the Line of Control (LoC) in north Kashmir’s Kupwara district on Saturday, killing five to seven intruders. The BAT generally comprises special forces personnel of the Pakistani Army and terrorists.

The bodies are lying close to the Line of Control (LoC).

Defence sources said the bodies may possibly be of Pakistan’s SSG commandoes.

On Friday, Chinar Corps Commander Lt General K J S Dhillon had said according to available intelligence reports, all the launchpads in Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir are full and infiltrators attempting to enter Kashmir.

This year, despite Balakot airstrikes, the infiltration has not stopped from across. Sources said over 30 militants managed to sneak into J&K till May-end.

A senior Army official said Pakistan has desperately attempted to push terrorists belonging to JeM and other outfits into Jammu and Kashmir over the last few days. “The response by security forces vindicates the build-up in the hinterland,” he said.

The Pakistan Army has, meanwhile, denied the Indian claim about action by Pakistani army regulars and militants across the Line of Control and that their bodies were lying on the Indian side.

Pakistan Army spokesman Maj Gen Asif Ghafoor on Saturday night denied the Indian claim as “mere propaganda” and said India was “trying to divert attention of the world form the situation of Kashmir.”

Similarly, the Foreign Office also issued a statement at about mid-night to reject the claims by India.

“We reject Indian allegations of cross-LoC action by Pakistan and possession of bodies,” FO said. — With PTI inputs